Learning by Arguing About Evidence and Explanations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Arguing About Firewall Policy
In this paper, we present a new framework to analyze firewall policy by using argumentation. At the core of this new idea is extending firewall rules with the concept of “reasons” and arguing about the reasons, not the rules. Depending on how the reasons are designed, the resulting framework can be useful in a number of ways: new anomalies in a firewall policy can be identified while, at the sa...
متن کاملArguing About Planning Alternatives
In discourse processing, two major problems are understanding the underlying connections between succe~ive dialog utterances and deciding on the content of a coherent dialog response. Thin paper presents a computational model of these tasks for a restricted class of argumentative dialogs. In these dialogs, each response presents a belief that justifies or contradicts another belief presented or...
متن کاملArguing about innateness.
This paper lays out the components of a language acquisition model, the interconnections among the components, and the differing stances of nativism and empiricism about syntax. After demonstrating that parsimony cannot decide between the two stances, the paper analyzes nine examples of evidence that have been used to argue for or against nativism, concluding that most pieces of evidence are ei...
متن کاملArguing on Communicative Goals in Explanations
This paper describes how we simulate a dialog aimed at resolving conflicts between an Instructing and an Executing Agent in explanation text planning. We describe how the two agents are modelled. We then illustrate the algorithm which, starting from the discovery of a conflict and proceeding through a set of negotiated belief revisions, brings to solve the conflict or to conclude that it cannot...
متن کاملArguing about Preferences and Decisions
Complex decisions involve many aspects that need to be considered, which complicates determining what decision has the most preferred outcome. Artificial agents may be required to justify and discuss their decisions to others. Designers must communicate their wishes to artificial agents. Research in argumentation theory has examined how agents can argue about what decision is best using goals a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argumentation
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0920-427X,1572-8374
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9060-0